Can any con explain how Bush did NOT violate FISA and break the law with his warrantless wiretapping? - break through bush in pokemon
Here is the legal language of the request:
A person is guilty of a crime if he intentionally --
(1) is the electronic surveillance in color of law involved, except as authorized by law or
(2) discloses or uses information obtained under color of law by electronic surveillance, knowing or reason to know that the information was obtained through electronic surveillance not authorized by law.
Notwithstanding any other law can the President, through the Attorney General to authorize electronic surveillance without a court order under this subchapter to acquire foreign intelligence for periods up to one year if the Attorney General confirmed in writing and under oath --
There is no risk that the surveillance is to obtain the contents of a message to the United States as a party;
Bush authorized the warrantless wiretapping of communications for the people in the United States are involved.
How is this not a crime?
Tuesday, December 15, 2009
Break Through Bush In Pokemon Can Any Con Explain How Bush Did NOT Violate FISA And Break The Law With His Warrantless Wiretapping?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
9 comments:
Yes see, perhaps, as here, for their remarks misinterpreted, ignored misunderstanding the law, the facts, the omission of essential details, done over "others also" excuse, etc.
Yes see, perhaps, as here, for their remarks misinterpreted, ignored misunderstanding the law, the facts, the omission of essential details, done over "others also" excuse, etc.
How do you obtain information that could prevent another 9 / 11? What do you do a lot of international calls to the Middle East? Perhaps the government is really against us!
Lions and tigers and bears! Oh!
How do you obtain information that could prevent another 9 / 11? What do you do a lot of international calls to the Middle East? Perhaps the government is really against us!
Lions and tigers and bears! Oh!
I believe that the right to speak, is violating it impossible for the president, the law. Remember, one of Nixon?
I believe that the right to speak, is violating it impossible for the president, the law. Remember, one of Nixon?
Do not violate a law of justice, because the Democrats voted in favor of HR 5825th
I think you should ask your legislator to contact, why listen to the Democrats, and not without a warrant.
blah blah blah
Neo Libs really want to give him a chance
only be grateful that so far not an attack on our soil like 9 / 11
only be silent and vote for Hillary as a zombie little good
Carte blanche was given by Congress without thorns - The Patriot Act (see everything and take precedence over all).
Bush is not the first, but this. Good Ol Clitton Bill had his fingers on your hard drive and allows the Authority, the police have never been under a decree. Stick in yer pipe!
Post a Comment